So, that is my objective (to help others improve the quality of their lectures). How often do you know the objectives of the lecturers you encounter. I will acknowledge that it is common to see a slide towards the beginning of the presentation that says "Objectives." Usually this slide is completely wrong from a pedagogic standpoint. Here is an example from a set of slides that were emailed to me by the American Heart Association. I have nothing at all against the AHA, it just happens to be the example that crossed my desk today. Here is slide #2 from a lecture called "The Future of Cardiovascular Disease: Heart Failure".
Objectives:
- Review epidemiology of heart failure
- Elderly
- Briefly review therapeutic advances
- Discuss major shortcomings in diagnosis and management of heart failure
- Future research directions
Pretty standard, huh? The problem is that this is the agenda. The speakers objective is to talk about these things. In educational terms, objectives are what the student will be able to accomplish as a result of the lecture. This is an oversimplified definition, but here is the difference:
Agenda:
- Briefly review therapeutic advances
- Discuss major shortcomings in diagnosis and management of heart failure
Objectives: (the learner will be able to)
- Describe the 3 most important therapeutic advances in heart failure treatment and the indication for use of each.
- Know the 3 most common errors in diagnosis and management of heart failure and how to avoid them.
No comments:
Post a Comment